IMPORTANT UPDATE:
http://www.royal.gov.uk/MonarchUK/Queena…
I quote:
“People often wonder whether laws apply to The Queen, since they are made in her name.
Given the historical development of the Sovereign as the ‘Fount of Justice’, civil and criminal proceedings cannot be taken against the Sovereign as a person under UK law. Acts of Parliament do not apply to The Queen in her personal capacity unless they are expressly stated to do so.
However, The Queen is careful to ensure that all her activities in her personal capacity are carried out in strict accordance with the law.
Under the Crown Proceedings Act (1947), civil proceedings can be taken against the Crown in its public capacity (this usually means proceedings against government departments and agencies, as the elected Government governs in The Queen’s name).
In the case of European Union law, laws are enforced in the United Kingdom through the United Kingdom’s national courts. There is therefore no machinery by which European law can be applied to The Queen in her personal capacity.
However, it makes no difference that there is no such mechanism, as The Queen will in any event scrupulously observe the requirements of EU law.
As a national of the United Kingdom, The Queen is a citizen of the European Union, but that in no way affects her prerogatives and responsibilities as the Sovereign.”
Amazing how we can force their hand when we kick the door enough times. 🙂
A British National, a Citizen of the EUSSR, and apparently still our Sovereign? Impossible if we still are operating under the constitution that gives her her royal protection from the Laws of the land! Look up any legal dictionary for the definitions of these terms. Oh what a wicked web we weave when we set out to deceive!
Further, in a response I had in March 2011 from Henry Bellingham, MP and Minister for Africa the United Nations Sovereign Territories and Conflict Areas (via my own sad excuse for an MP):
“The formal title of The Queen is Her majesty Queen Elizabeth II of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Her Majesty’s position as Constitutional Head of State of the United Kingdom has not (NOT is underlined in the original letter) changed with entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty”
This seems to disagree with current legislation where her formal title apparently still includes the word ‘Sovereign’ and also ‘Defender of the faith’. Hmmm
Please fell free to correct this as I didn’t bother looking into her former title any further as I’m too occupied with what is happening now.
Bellingham’s reply contains no references or supporting evidence therefore I must assume it is just opinion however he declares that “I am replying as Minister responsible for Protocol matters”.
Funny this responsible Minister simply ‘forgot’ to mention that she is an EU citizen and apparently now also a British national. Strange that…or are they making it all up as they go along?
People interested in this ‘minor’ issue of us no longer having a sovereign monarch should look at the following legislation for clarification:
Royal and Parliamentary Titles Act 1927 (and amendments)
Contextual amendments include:
Royal Titles Act 1953
UK Public General Act 1950 c.6
UK Public General Act 1977 c.18
Interpretation Act 1978
My own research since this FOI has confirmed that we are being duped, lied to, conned, and I would even throw the word defrauded in there too, on a scale that beggars belief. Read the Bill of Rights, Act of Settlement, Act of Union and Magna Carta! Does this also mean that Scotland is now a separate country now that we are no longer a united kingdom? What the person who was formally my queen and her team of little helpers are doing here is unlawful and unconstitutional and completely in their own narrow interests. I have my own well-founded reasons based on my ongoing research to have the opinion that her reason for desperately wanting to stay above the law is that we’d need to build a new prison for her family members if we were allowed to investigate them and have them before a Common Law jury.
Please note this is NOT a political rant. It is a statement of hard fact that may just be unpalatable for some to absorb.
A final point. If we no longer have a Sovereign Monarch do we have an abandoned throne? If so, under whose authority do the govt, the civil service, the army, the police, the judiciary, local councils, HMRC etc etc all operate and order us around? It begins with E and ends in U and what we have here is just smoke and mirrors to keep us plebs complacent while the busy little termites are occupied undermining the foundation of everything that makes Britain what it was. Does this now also technically nullify all legislation imposed on us by the Sovereign’s authority?
In light of what I have discovered from my own research/work I have joined the British Constitution Group as I intend to have these people banged up for life for what they’ve done to this country and our people. We certainly can’t rely on our constitutional representatives to step up to the plate. If no-one who should do the job is willing to do it then its time for us to do it ourselves….Lawful Rebellion
www.bcgroup.org.uk
Its out duty under Magna Carta and our obligation to future generations. No politics here, its constitutional.
Have fun with this one guys…